Do no harm: Who should bear the costs of retired NFL players’ medical bills?

Do no harm: Who should bear the costs of retired NFL players’ medical bills?

Do no harm: Who should bear the costs of retired NFL players’ medical bills?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/do-no-harm-who-should-bear-the-costs-of-retired-nfl-players-medical-bills/2013/05/09/2dae88ba-b70e-11e2-b568-6917f6ac6d9d_story.html?tid=ts_carousel

Video: It’s been 24 years since Reggie Williams played in the NFL. But everyday he feels the impact from his 14-year career. Today Williams is one of thousands of former NFL players fighting to get help from the league to cover medical expenses.
1420
Share to Facebook
Share on Twitter
Add to PersonalPost
Save to Kindle
Share via Email
Print Article
More
By Sally Jenkins and Rick Maese, Friday, May 10, 2:35 AM

After 24 knee operations, the National Football League’s former Man of the Year leans heavily on a crutch. When Reggie Williams pulls up his pants leg, what’s underneath looks like the trimmings from a butcher shop. His right leg is so ravaged that it’s three inches shorter than his left. Worse, it’s uninsured.

Once, Williams was the NFL’s high ideal. From 1976 to 1989 he was a spring-legged linebacker for the Cincinnati Bengals who set franchise records and played in two Super Bowls. Off the field, he was a civic-minded Dartmouth graduate who won humanitarian awards and served as a city councilman while he was still playing. He was so loyal to the game that he was a pallbearer at legendary team founder Paul Brown’s funeral. He would even be invited to apply for the job of NFL commissioner.

Gallery

Reggie Williams estimates that health problems stemming from his NFL playing career have cost him at least $500,000 out of pocket. How much of that should be the NFL’s responsibility?

More on this series
Pain and drugs in the NFL

Sally Jenkins and Rick Maese
PART TWO | Coping with injuries and pain in pro football has fostered a culture of painkiller use and abuse.
Do no harm? NFL’s medical dilemma.

Sally Jenkins and Rick Maese
PART ONE | Medical care in the NFL is medicine turned on its head, often with troubling results.
Redskins’ doctors try to stay ahead of the curve
NFL injuries increasing

INFOGRAPHIC | Almost 4,500 injuries were reported in 2011, an average of more than two per active player, according to the NFL.
Judgment call: Fixing a meniscus

INFOGRAPHIC | A tear to the knee’s shock-absorbing meniscus can be treated in two ways.

But now, Williams and his battered legs amount to a bill no one wants to pay. Since 2005 Williams, 58, has suffered a cascade of health problems he says stem from his 14-year football career, including multiple knee replacements and a bone infection, which he estimates have cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars out of pocket.

Williams says he is unable to qualify for most NFL disability benefits, and the Bengals — the only team for whom he played — are opposing him in a workers’ compensation claim that would provide for his medical care. These tedious battles have transformed him from a league champion into a critic. “All they’ve done is fought me on everything,” he says, “including even sending me a Band-Aid.”

Who should bear the costs of football-related medical problems that arise years after retirement? This question is at the heart of Williams’s case — and scores of others like it. The average NFL player’s career lasts just 3.3 seasons. Studies show that one in four retirees will need a joint replacement, they suffer arthritis at five times the rate of their peers and are four times as likely to suffer neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s or ALS.

Critics say the NFL’s medical benefits don’t adequately address the full range of these problems. The NFL’s health insurance lasts five years after retirement — players who lasted fewer than three seasons don’t qualify for it at all — but the most serious health consequences of a football career often don’t manifest for a decade or more.

The NFL’s disability board, jointly administered by management and the players’ union, has a denial rate of almost 60 percent. When players file for workers’ compensation for the on-the-job harm they suffered, they often find their claims opposed by their former teams. The league is currently in legal and legislative fights with at least 3,000 former players, who, like Williams, have attempted to seek reparation for their injuries by filing claims in worker-friendly states. When these claims and all other avenues for medical care are exhausted, the cost of their poor health can often fall on the taxpayer.

“First and foremost, the NFL is in the hurt business,” said Mel Owens, a former NFL player who is now a California attorney and represents Williams. “In workers’ comp they will end up paying for the players’ brains, hearts and livers, as well as orthopedic injuries, and it’s expensive. But they don’t wa

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Do no harm: Who should bear the costs of retired NFL players’ medical bills?

  1. Pingback: AFL-CIO president: ‘We’re not going to let the employer decide who our members are any longer’ | Wind Drinker

    • It is my opinion that although players go in of their own free will to play – that they in no way collect the actual benefits of their having been high entertainment for the masses – those who win are the owners of the game – who collect zillions at their expense. The costs of injuries to players – long term or short – should be born by those owners for the life of the player. Perhaps they will value the health of their players and such injuries will be reduced through better rules – to cut the EXCITEMENT…yes, but, to increase health… Othewise, owners have no reason to stop what is clearly profitable… to them…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s